托福综合写作范文解析：该不该设立保护森林基金

以下是新东方托福为您带来的托福综合写作解析：该不该设立保护森林基金，更多托福写作资讯请关注新东方托福。
想获得更多资料，可以查看新东方托福6月精选和新东方雅思6月精选。欢迎来电咨询更多托福课程，免费获取更多托福资料。

Topic议题：该不该设立基金来定期拨钱保护森林

ReadingListeningThesis总论点A fund should be established to make regular payments for forests.The payment can not bring about these there benefits mentioned in the reading

Sub-point 1 分论点1Reducing agricultural damage by preventing farmers from using forests as farmland for agriculture.If forests are not allowed to be transformed into farmlands, food will be deficient. In order to generate more food, intensive methods will be used, thus aggravating damage.

Sub-point2 分论点2Helping the habitants living in the forest.The payment will not improve the forest habitants’ lives for money are first received by local government and landlords who are not forest villagers.

Sub-point 3 分论点3Promoting biodiversity.Biodiversity can not be improved for those payment will be used for plantation forest, man-made one, in which only trees of great commercial use are planted, for example, in some plantation forest only tung trees and walnut trees grow.

托福综合写作范文Sample answer:

The reading appeals to the view that establishing a fund to make regular payments for forests is a plausible suggestion for it can protect environment. However, the professor refutes the three benefits mentioned in the reading.

Firstly, the reading holds that such suggestion can reduce agricultural damage by preventing farmers from using forests as farmlands for agriculture. The professor disagrees with this by suggesting that if forests are not allowed to be transformed into farmlands, food will be deficient. In order to generate more food, intensive technology will be used, thus aggravating damage to environment.

Secondly, by illustrating the fact that local governments and landlords who are not forest villagers will first receive the payment, the professor refutes the reading’s claim that the payment can improve the forest habitants’ lives.

Finally, in the reading passage, it explains that the plan can promote biodiversity. In contrast, the professor holds that biodiversity will not be improved because the payment will be used for plantation forest, man-made one, in which only trees of great commercial use will be planted. For example, in some plantation forests only tung trees and walnut trees grow.