雅思听力
雅思阅读
2016-08-25 15:10
来源:新东方整理
作者:上海新东方
Revision: Traditional Marxist Explanations
Who makes laws/benefits from them?
On a theoretical level, Marxists believe that society is divided into the two fundamental classes, those that "have", and those that "have not". They believe that the superstructure (the state, the police, the legal system, the family) maintain and reflect ruling class ideology.
The state (an agent of the ruling class) passes laws which serve those at the "commanding heights of power". These laws coerce the subject class and create a "false class consciousness".
Laws are made by the state, which represents the interests of the RC.
CHAMBLISS – "The heart of the capitalist state is the protection of private property" – the state pass laws that protect property, not people.
SNIDER – The state is reluctant to pass laws that regulate large capitalist concerns, as they may scare off investors and damage profitability.
This overvaluing of "property over people" is justified through the education system and the media, which transmit the values of materialism and the "right"to own private property. This can be seen across the media, from television shows that give advice on buying houses, to programs such as "crimewatch" and "watchdog". As such, the superstructure plays a significant role in our secondary socialization.
Sometimes laws are passed that appear to benefit all classes, but they are rarely enforced.
GRAHAM'S study of drug abuse prevention highlights this. He studied the government attempts to crack down of illegal amphetamine use in the USA. However, pressures from the pharmaceutical companies that produce the drug lead to the "failure" of stricter drug control. Graham concluded that "the end result is an all out war on all drugs that are not a source of corporate income".
PEARCE points out that some laws are passed that appear to benefit the subject class only (e.g. health and safety legislation), but actually serve a hidden purpose; they keep the subject class loyal to their superiors and ensure that the workforce is healthy and efficient.
CHAMBLISS – "non decision making". Many other things may be considered criminal if the RC did not define what should and should not be (e.g. movie magnate – people starving a few blocks away).
ANGELA DAVIS – Black panthers – "the real criminals of society are not those that populate the prisons, but those that steal the wealth of the world from its people.
Who breaks the laws/gets caught?
Crime is widespread in all social strata, it is not "class bound".
SNIDER – The RC commit most crimes, although this is masked through selective law enforcement. 20,000 people are murdered in USA per year. This figure is over quadruple the amount for workplace deaths (i.e. due to violation of health and safety laws, industrial diseases). However, such deaths rarely come to the attention of the criminal justice system.
SNIDER – USA street crime costs $4 billion per year. Losses from corporate crime are 20 times greater. Despite the enormous costs of corporate crime however, the penalties and chances of prosecution for those involved are small. Quoting from various statistics, she points out that over a period of 70 years, only1, 551 prosecutions were made against corporate criminals, with only 4.9% of these criminals receiving a jail sentence.
CHAMBLISS’S SEATTLE STUDY – Study of criminal activity spanned over a decade (1962-1972). Consisted of interviews with all members of the social strata, from police and legal officials, to prostitutes. He argued that it is money + power that determines who gets arrested and who does not. He found that although crime stats were indicative of high rates of working class crime, it was actually the ruling elite that were the "criminals". Their crime syndicate (which consisted of leading businessmen, legal officials and politicians) was responsible for the organization of pornography, prostitution and illegal gambling. Profits were boosted through tax evasion (which was "ignored"by the bank manager) and anyone threatening to "blow the whistle"on their activities was murdered. Chambliss concluded that those who operate organized crime are not members of a "criminal class", but are members of the ruling elite, who exploit their power and wealth (e.g. through bribing policemen to overlook their activities) in order to serve their interests.
This study has been extremely influential, although cross referencing with methodology, it can be criticized. The study is based on using interviews, and it is impossible to tell whether the responses given by participants were genuine. They may have been conforming to a desirability bias (giving the answers they think the researcher wants) although giving the nature of such information, this seems unlikely. Also, the actual questions Chambliss asked may have skewed the findings, as he may have asked "leading questions" (provoking a particular response)
Why break the law? Why enforce it?
Marxists believe that capitalism causes crime for four main reasons
……
CHAMBLISS argues that the greed, hostility and aggression that is generated by the capitalist system motivates behavior within all levels of society. Thus "the pimp, mugger and prostitute use what they have to get what they can, whereas those in higher income brackets have more effective means to grab a slice of the cake".
GORDON – crime = a rational response to the capitalist system. In a "dog eats dog" world where competition is the order of the day, people will go to any lengths to survive. This is particularly evident in America – minimal welfare services.
Selective law enforcement
SLE has a number of consequences. By prosecuting the occasional RC criminal, the fiction that laws are passed for the good of society as a whole is maintained.
GORDON – 3 ways the practice of SLE supports capitalism
……
4 further arguments that can be added to GORDON'S
……
Criticisms of conventional Marxist criminology
Feminists – Marxism places undue emphasis on class inequality, ignoring the role of patriarchy in shaping how the criminal justice system operates.
Marxists overestimate the extent to which "capitalism causes crime". Marxists assume that in a communist utopia, crime would be eradicated, but historically, this has not been the case. Before the fall of communism in the Soviet Union, crime was plentiful and had not been eradicated by the abolition of class conflict.
Jones – disputes that capitalism always causes crime – points to Switzerland, which has long embraced the capitalist system yet as a low crime rate (although on a methodological level, this could be down do hw crimes are reported and recorded differently).
Marxists have an oversimplistic view of crime. Although there are clearly some people with more power than others, this does not mean that they can pass any law that benefits them. E.g. "insider trading" = highly lucrative for the RC, but is a criminal offence that is punishable by prison term.
"Left realists" claim Marxism places undue emphasis of corporate crime, arguing that robbery, burglary and other violent crimes cause more harm than Marxists recognize. The victims of these crimes are usually WC, and the consequences can be devastating for them. Thus, left realists criticize Marxists for giving a one -sided picture of crime which does little to deal with the crimes that the majority of society face.
Postmodernists reject Marxist criminology as a "metaarrative" that is neither believable nor defensible.
推荐阅读
若想获取更多详尽出国留学攻略以及雅思备考资讯,可以打开我们【上海新东方雅思网】,涵盖雅思真题机经,雅思写作、口语、听力、阅读以及留学名校介绍等,也许就能找到你真正需要的。上海新东方雅思网在这里预祝各位考生学习顺利,都能考取自己满意的学校。
上海新东方寒假班报名地址
|
||||
|
新东方留学院校库,留学选校有门道
A BETTER YOU,A BIGGER WORLD!
版权及免责声明
①凡本网注明"稿件来源:新东方"的所有文字、图片和音视频稿件,版权均属新东方教育科技集团(含本网和新东方网) 所有,任何媒体、网站或个人未经本网协议授权不得转载、链接、转贴或以其他任何方式复制、发表。已经本网协议授权的媒体、网站,在下载使用时必须注明"稿件来源:新东方",违者本网将依法追究法律责任。
② 本网未注明"稿件来源:新东方"的文/图等稿件均为转载稿,本网转载仅基于传递更多信息之目的,并不意味着赞同转载稿的观点或证实其内容的真实性。如其他媒体、网站或个人从本网下载使用,必须保留本网注明的"稿件来源",并自负版权等法律责任。如擅自篡改为"稿件来源:新东方",本网将依法追究法律责任。
③ 如本网转载稿涉及版权等问题,请作者见稿后在两周内速来电与新东方网联系,电话:010-60908555。
雅思听力
雅思阅读